war against some terrorists
We Just Don’t Get It
| As I write this, it certainly occurs to me that many will think me heartless, uncaring. But consider this. Why will we be focusing on a few dozen deaths in England when, in the rest of the world including, Iraq, thousands are dying quietly and not so quietly as we speak? We will be focusing on this event for the same reason we focus on missing and crazy young white women. Our focus will be a product of our ethnocentrism, our racism, and our intellectual inability to focus on the big pictures, the things that have real importance when one is thinking about the future of humanity and the future of the planet and all its citizens, both human and nonhuman.
As far as terror, we’ve been there, done that. We’ve had all the commissions, all the hearings, and all the endless talk from policiticans about what needs to be done, what wasn’t done, and what is being done. We are spending billions on what is purported to be homeland security. And we will spend billions more. But at the end of the day, we will continue to have terrorist attacks. Terrorism will be part of what is the fundamental nature of the 21st century. And all the big problems that we choose to ignore will only exacerbate what is really the symptom of terrorism.
| | [more]
The reality of this barbaric bombing If we are fighting insurgency in Iraq, what makes us think insurgency won't come to us? by Robert Fisk
| "If you bomb our cities," Osama bin Laden said in one of his recent video tapes, "we will bomb yours." There you go, as they say. It was crystal clear Britain would be a target ever since Tony Blair decided to join George Bush's "war on terror" and his invasion of Iraq. We had, as they say, been warned. The G8 summit was obviously chosen, well in advance, as Attack Day.
And it's no use Mr Blair telling us yesterday that "they will never succeed in destroying what we hold dear". "They" are not trying to destroy "what we hold dear". They are trying to get public opinion to force Blair to withdraw from Iraq, from his alliance with the United States, and from his adherence to Bush's policies in the Middle East. The Spanish paid the price for their support for Bush - and Spain's subsequent retreat from Iraq proved that the Madrid bombings achieved their objectives - while the Australians were made to suffer in Bali.
It is easy for Tony Blair to call yesterdays bombings "barbaric" - of course they were - but what were the civilian deaths of the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq in 2003, the children torn apart by cluster bombs, the countless innocent Iraqis gunned down at American military checkpoints? When they die, it is "collateral damage"; when "we" die, it is "barbaric terrorism".
If we are fighting insurgency in Iraq, what makes us believe insurgency won't come to us? One thing is certain: if Tony Blair really believes that by "fighting terrorism" in Iraq we could more efficiently protect Britain - fight them there rather than let them come here, as Bush constantly says - this argument is no longer valid.
| | [more]
The price of occupation
| Ever since 9/11, I have been arguing that the "war against terror" is immoral and counterproductive. It sanctions the use of state terror - bombing raids, torture, countless civilian deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq - against Islamo-anarchists whose numbers are small, but whose reach is deadly. The solution then, as now, is political, not military. The British ruling elite understood this perfectly well in the case of Ireland. Security measures, anti-terror laws rushed through parliament, identity cards, a curtailment of civil liberties, will not solve the problem. If anything, they will push young Muslims in the direction of mindless violence. font>
The real solution lies in immediately ending the occupation of Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine. Just because these three wars are reported sporadically and mean little to the everyday lives of most Europeans does not mean the anger and bitterness they arouse in the Muslim world and its diaspora is insignificant. As long as western politicians wage their wars and their colleagues in the Muslim world watch in silence, young people will be attracted to the groups who carry out random acts of revenge.
At the beginning of the G8, Blair suggested that "poverty was the cause of terrorism". It is not so. The principal cause of this violence is the violence being inflicted on the people of the Muslim world. And unless this is recognised, the horrors will continue.
| | [more]
The Logic of Suicide Terrorism:It’s the occupation, not the fundamentalism
| RP: The central fact is that overwhelmingly suicide-terrorist attacks are not driven by religion as much as they are by a clear strategic objective: to compel modern democracies to withdraw military forces from the territory that the terrorists view as their homeland. From Lebanon to Sri Lanka to Chechnya to Kashmir to the West Bank, every major suicide-terrorist campaign—over 95 percent of all the incidents—has had as its central objective to compel a democratic state to withdraw.
| | [more] |